Why 'existential humility' could be the solution to the current cultural conflicts

 We are living in a time of extreme polarization, where passionate debates are being held about contentious cultural issues such as immigration, racial justice, abortion, and LGBTQ+ rights, among others. With both sides staking out unwavering stances and condemning anyone who disagree, the culture wars have reached a fever pitch.



Is there any way forward in a situation like this other than constant conflict? Accepting what psychologists refer to as "existential humility"—awareness of our own knowledge and comprehension gaps—might hold the key to the solution. Recognizing that we don't have all the answers to many of the big problems pertaining to human life is a key component of existential humility.


The Boundaries of Human Understanding One of humanity's worst dangers throughout history has been the arrogance of certitude. We have a propensity to assume that we already know the answers and that our existing worldviews and ideas are unquestionably accurate. However, fresh knowledge and viewpoints have repeatedly upended human perception.
The notion that the Earth swung around the Sun was heretical and a danger to the status quo only a few millennia ago. We now consider it to be an established truth about the cosmos. As new information becomes available, our scientific theories are continuously updated and improved.
We know remarkably little even in fields beyond the physical sciences. 

On the largest scale, we don't even know why the universe exists at all, let alone what's outside of it (assuming there are even boundaries). "The thing that doesn't fit is the thing that's most interesting," physicist Richard Feynman once said.
Accepting Our Empirical Lowliness A stance of existential humility, which acknowledges that our knowledge and understanding are always provisional and inadequate, would seem to be the appropriate course of action given the enormity of what we do not know.
Researchers in psychology have discovered that a crucial component of critical thinking and the formation of reasonable views is intellectual humility, or the recognition that our beliefs might be incorrect and the readiness to revise them in light of new evidence. 

Furthermore, exercising epistemic humility does not entail inaction or a resignedly ambivalent attitude. On the contrary, it necessitates ongoing inquiry, education, and dialogue. The true obstacles to knowledge and advancement, according to science philosopher Karl Popper, are dogmatic certainty and the fear of being proven incorrect.
A Humility, Curiosity, and Caring Attitude Author of "The Righteous Mind," social psychologist Jonathan Haidt likens human nature to that of an elephant rider in his book. The strong elephant symbolizes our instinctive emotional responses and moral intuitions, while the "rider" stands for our ability to think and deliberate.
Haidt claims that we far too frequently allow the elephant to go amok while the rider remains in control when it comes to contentious cultural and political issues.

We might need to give usually underappreciated qualities like curiosity, consideration, empathy, patience, and humility top priority in order to foster this way of thinking. These enable us to meet people who hold different opinions as complete human beings as opposed to flat personas. Rather than rushing to easy fixes, they give us the grace and endurance to grapple with perplexing contradictions.
However, existential humility is more than just a cerebral quality. It is more profound than being courteous or accepting of others; it is the result of an abiding realization that life's great issues are incredibly complicated and huge.
In front of the great mysteries of consciousness, subjective experience, time, the universe, and awareness itself, this inspires awe, amazement, and reverence. We are curious and filled with existential awe and desire to explore.

We now enjoy the hard-won benefits of cultural progress, such as the intellectual humility found in democratic institutions, science, and philosophical discussion. Even though they are far from ideal, they make room for constant review and modification, minority voices, and unconventional ideas that may finally be accepted.
Therefore, the necessary move toward existential humility might not be as drastic as it might first seem. It stands for a return to and a strengthening of the ethical and intellectual values of the Enlightenment, which gave origin to modernity itself: freedom of thought, open and critical inquiry, and suspension of judgment.
We may create what Bertrand Russell referred to as a "fruitful uncertainty of metaphysics"—a posture of epistemic modesty combined with active participation in the big open spaces—instead of giving in to a tribalism of never-ending conflict.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post